Latest News Displaying items by tag: Previews
2012 Capsule Previews: Teams #1 to #12
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 Capsule Previews
|
Season Preview Capsules All through the off season, the teams have been training and preparing for their shot at a trip to Georgia for the NCAA Nationals. Here's a quick look at the teams, as we head into the final preperations before the start of the season. Last season Bama entered the campaign needing to replace 10 routines from some key veteran champion athletes. But, bouyed by one of the top recruiting classes in the country, Bama finished the season on top, winning yet another National Championship. Could they repeat? They certainly have the firepower. They lose just four routines from last year (from star Kayla Hoffman) but have a strong incoming class that features three elites, including one former World Champion Kayla Williams. However, a host of old and new challengers for the title are back and ready to take on the Tide. Last year's runnerup UCLA is back and potentially stronger, with the return of star Vanessa Zamarripa and a standout frosh class that includes National Team members Mattie Larson and Cassie Whitcomb. NCAA BB champ Samantha Peszek and Elyse Hopfner-Hibbs lead a strong and deep veteran core. Only a select few teams have ever won a National Title: Bama, UCLA, UGA and Utah. Could another team join that club? Florida boasts another strong class of frosh, and will use the added strength while seeking to bolster their consistency. Beam was a problem area last year and they'll look to build a strong lineup on the event. OU's well-coached crew maximizes their potential on each event. The experienced core is looking strong, led by Megan Ferguson, Natasha Kelley and Kayla Nowak, but they may need to boost their dynamics on VT and FX to maximize their chances. This could come from their frosh, especially Erica Brewer and elite Rebecca Clark. Utah has a large incoming class of L10s and former elites, let by potential standout Georgia Dabritz. The Utes will also get back the services of Kyndal Robarts. These additions should give an "end of the lineup" boost and added difficulty on VT and FX, while providing for a very deep lineup. A number of other teams will be making a run for the Super Six this season, but first, all the teams will have to try to earn one of 12 spots at Nationals. Overall, the frosh have a huge potential to boost various teams into National meet contention. We'll see teams that finished outside the Top 18 last season being now able to push the returning teams for a spot at Nationals. In all likelihood, at the end of the season we may have at least 20 programs in contention for the 12 spots at the National meet. We'll have our ranking of incoming classes published later this month. The final ranking will be a tough decision, with many excellent and impactful recruiting classse in the mix. A full list of the newcomers is posted here. . This season is unusual in the number of high level US and foreign elites entering school this season. This bumper crop of talent is usually seen in a post-Olympic year. Other elite standouts (on other squads) include National Team members Ivana Hong and Samantha Shapiro at Stanford, Chelsea Davis at UGA and Jessie DeZiel at Nebraska. The class also includes former VISA Championships senior international elite qualifiers Rheagan Courville at LSU, Annette Miele at Michigan, Jackie McCartin at Washington, and Morgan Steigerwalt at ASU. Foreign elites (like Emma Willis at Iowa), former junior international elites (like Randi Lau at LSU) and top L10s (like '11 Sr D co-champ Allison Flores at Arizona) should also make a big impact. Add to this rising talents in the L10 ranks and improvements among the returning veterans and most teams will feature improved squads this season. Last season, we saw a number of nail-biting finishes at Regionals. Traditional powers like Florida and Utah saw strong challenges in their Regions, and the Tuscaloosa Regional saw just 0.65 separate 2nd from last. The increasing parity is partially due to a rising pool of talent, a higher level of coaching talent, and a relatively static NCAA code (by which routines are evaluated). This combination creates the potential that at least one of the preseason Top 12, and possibly a traditional top qualifier, will once again not be qualifying to Nationals. Last season, Stanford went from Super Six to the sidelines, and in prior seasons, both UGA and UCLA missed the National meet. The tables below are as complete as we know at this point in the season. The tables will be updated as the season gets closer and new information becomes available. Also, check out the Key to the Tables at the right to interpret the codes we use in the capsules. |
Key to the Tables: Ranking: By 2012 Preseason Coaches' Poll Coaches: Only regular, paid coaches are listed. Starting Routines: Defined by starting lineup in last meet of the post season. Fr = Freshman Status Codes for Returners: I = major season ending injury in 2011 S = Under suspension |
|
|
|
2011 Capsule Previews
|
Season Preview Capsules Last season's finale saw the UCLA Bruins return to the top of the team podium, holding off fast rising upstart Oklahoma. Bama was close behind in third, just ahead of Stanford and host Florida. In fact, places #2 to #5 were separated by the narrowest of margins. Just 0.25 separated the teams that finished 2nd through 5th in the Super Six. In a year of big changes, defending National Champion Georgia Gym did not even advance to the National meet, after five straight National Titles. They tied for 2nd at their Regional, but lost the tiebreaker to Oregon State, proving once again the smallest of errors can make a difference, and that every routine counts. The increasing talent and coaching parity in the NCAA, combined with rules that put the emphasis on execution, are creating a highly competitive situation. Since the NCAA began sanctioning a championships in Women's Gymnastics in 1982, just four teams have won the National title: Bama, UCLA, UGA, and Utah. Will this be the year that another school finally breaks into that illustruous club? Defending champion UCLA will be seeking their 7th National title, and will be loaded with most of their returning stars. Plus, they welcome one of the nation's strongest recruiting classes, headlined by Olympian Sam Peszek. Or will Florida or Oklahoma be able to unseat the Bruins? Florida features a lineup packed with elite-level stars including 2010 US World Championship team member Mackenzie Caquatto. Last year, Coach Faehn said the team's performance was impacted by the weight of their own expectations of competing for the title in their home gym. This season, a new mental approach is planned to help them ascend to the top spot. The Sooners, on the other hand, have lost some key athletes like star Hollie Vise, but they too return a strong veteran core and welcome a talented cast of newcomers. Last year's RQS #1 ranked team, Alabama, is back with another tough squad, and has a talented set of newcomers as well. Not to be overlooked is Stanford, which lost top AAer Carly Janiga but adds Canadian World Championship team member Kristina Vaculik. The final member of last season's Super Six, Utah, welcomes a large set of frosh, led by elite star Corrie Lothrop, that look to return the Utes back to the Super Six once again. Just outside of last year's Super Six, but looking to break into the top ranks are Nebraska, Oregon State, Michigan, LSU, Arkansas and Missouri. Michigan returns a veteran squad, bolstered by the return of fifth year senior Sarah Curtis. Nebraska returns 22 of 24 rouetines from last year's National Finals, where they finished 7th. Likewise, Oregon State returns a strong core and welcomes a strong incoming class, including former National Team member Britney Ranzy. Last season, Missouri returned to the NCAA finals after a long absence. With increasing parity, any number of teams could knock off a traditional favorite and make their way to the National meet. A number of offseason coaching changes will also add a new flavor to the mix, with perhaps a record number of changes at the returning Top 25 teams. Despite the threat of potentially game changing rule changes, in the end, much has remained the same. The threat of a "all scores count" system is gone, and teams still count the top five scores per event. The NCAA code modifications were once again very minor, with very few changes that will impact skill selection or scores. In fact, this may be the least amount of changes in a season in recent memory. The net result will be more teams than ever will be capable of posting a high team score at Regionals, and the smallest of errors could lead to a team staying at home in April. The tables below as complete as we know at this point in the season. If you have additional updates or corrections, please submit them using the link above. |
Key to the Tables: Ranking: By 2011 Preseason Coaches Poll Coaches: Only regular, paid coaches are listed. Starting Routines: Defined by starting lineup in last meet of the post season. Fr = Freshman Status Codes for Returners: I = major season ending injury in 2010 S = Under suspension |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Teams Ranked #13 to #25 on the Next Page |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||